A Guide to Orbiting Europe: An Analysis of Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade Between the Single Market and Non-EEA European States

Authors

  • Sasson Ziv-Loewy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62327/pt4v9r8nqz

Keywords:

Europe, Tarrif, Trade, European Union, Single Market, Economy

Abstract

The European Union has economic gravity. More specifically, the EU’s economic gravity is captured by the European Single Market. Whereas the EU has a broad political mandate, the Single Market’s focus is uniting Europe’s economies. On the global stage, the economic gravity of the European Single Market is so overwhelmingly powerful that trying to exist only on the perimeter of the orbit would cause long-term political and economic frictions and enshrine structural inefficiencies in domestic law. These ramifications result in unnecessary losses from misaligned regulations leading to decreased trade and inefficient production. The partial access that countries not part of the Single Market are able to negotiate for currently costs them influence over European decision making and swathes of market access in sectors which are not subjects of these trade deals. From the perspective of the United Kingdom, sovereignty is valued over Single Market membership, where sovereignty is defined as the ability of a country to control its domestic law. This was seen clearly in the Brexit vote, where Britons expressly decided that the costs of the European Union were too great to bear.1 However, I will argue that it is a mistake for countries on the outer orbit of the EU to resist the pull of the Single Market. I will demonstrate the economic gravity of EU states in trade and strength at the negotiating table because of the strategic wielding of its massive consumer base. Next, I will analyze why this is a problem for countries trying to achieve an imagined “best of both worlds” by positioning themselves at the edge of the European orbit. I will analyze possible paths forward by looking at the case for unilaterally implementing European law into domestic legislation with Switzerland as an exemplary case which is nevertheless inalienably flawed. I will conclude that even a country like the United Kingdom, the largest economy on the perimeter of the European community, feels the immense pull of Europe’s economic gravity and must continue to align itself further with Europe, or else face the consequences of failing to pick a path.

References

Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Mutual Recognition in Relation to Conformity Assessment. Official Jour- nal of the European Communities L 114 (April 30, 2002). https://eur-lex.eu- ropa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2002/309(5)/oj/eng

Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA Agreement), OJ No L 1. European Free Trade Association. January 3, 1994. http://data.eu- ropa.eu/eli/agree_internation/1994/1/2016-04-07.

A Practical Guide to the Economic Analysis of Non-Tariff Measures. World Trade Organization, 2012. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publica- tions_e/non_tariff_measures_e.htm.d

Arnorsson, Arnar Freyr, and Gylfi Zoega. “On the Causes of Brexit.” European Jour- nal of Political Economy 55 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.02.001.

Berg, Aslak. “Living Next Door to an Elephant: Lessons for the UK from EFTA.” Centre for European Reform, April 29, 2024. https://www.cer.eu/in- sights/living-next-door-elephant-lessons-uk-efta.

Bradford, Anu. “The Brussels Effect.” Northwestern University Law Review 107, no. 1 (2012): 1–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001

Cernat, Lucian. The Art of the Mini-Deals: The Invisible Part of EU Trade Policy. ECIPE Policy Brief No. 11/2023. Brussels: European Centre for International Political Economy, October 2023. https://ecipe.org/wp-content/up- loads/2023/10/ECI_23_PolicyBrief_11-2023_LY03.pdf.

Downing, Emma, and Sarah Coe. Brexit: Future UK Agriculture Policy. House of Commons Library Briefing Paper No. CBP 8218. London: House of Com- mons Library. https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/com- mons-library/Brexit-UK-agriculture-policy-CBP-8218.pdf.

EFTA Studies. “Swiss–EU Relations.” Accessed March 4, 2026. https://www.efta- studies.org/swiss-eu-relations.

EFTA Studies. “Switzerland’s Sectoral Access to the EU’s Single Market.” February 8, 2019. https://www.efta-studies.org/sectoral-access-to-the-single-mar- ket.

European Commission. Albania Report 2025. Enlargement Package. Brussels: Eu- ropean Commission, November 4, 2025. Accessed March 1, 2026. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/albania-report-2025_en.

European Commission. Directorate-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations. Albania Country Fiche. https://enlargement.ec.eu- ropa.eu/document/download/de2675ef-51c8-44e7-bf62- 3c781ef938e6_en?filename=Albania+country+fiche.pdf.

European Commission. “EU Common Charger Rules: Power All Your Devices with a Single Charger.” December 28, 2024. https://commission.eu- ropa.eu/news-and-media/news/eu-common-charger-rules-power-all- your-devices-single-charger-2024-12-28_en.

European Commission. “EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement.” Access2Mar- kets. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/content/eu-uk- trade-and-cooperation-agreement.

European Commission. “Switzerland.” Access2Markets. https://trade.ec.eu- ropa.eu/access-to-markets/en/content/switzerland.

European Commission Single Market Scoreboard. “Transposition (Enforcement Tools).” Accessed March 1, 2026. https://single-market-scoreboard.ec.eu- ropa.eu/enforcement-tools/transposition_en.

Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Swiss Federal Council. “Switzerland Re- mains a Committed Partner to the EU Even Without the Institutional Agreement.” May 26, 2021. https://www.eda.ad- min.ch/eda/en/fdfa/fdfa/aktuell/newsuebersicht/2021/05/schweiz-eu- engagierte-partnerschaft.html.

Fraga-García, Miriam, Raquel Taléns-Visconti, Amparo Nácher-Alonso, and Octa- vio Díez-Sales. “New Scenario in the Field of Medical Devices in the Euro- pean Union: Switzerland and the United Kingdom Become Third Coun- tries.” Farmacia Hospitalaria 46, no. 4 (July–August 2022): 244–250. https://doi.org/10.7399/Å.13178.

GOV.UK. “Get an Export Health Certificate.” Accessed March 4, 2026. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/get-an-export-health-certificate.

GOV.UK. “Summary: The UK’s New Relationship with the EU.” Updated July 2, 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/summary-the-uks- new-relationship-with-the-eu/summary-the-uks-new-relationship-with- the-eu.

GOV.UK. “Using the UKCA Marking.” Accessed March 4, 2026. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/using-the-ukca-marking.

Hoekman, Bernard, and Alessandro Nicita. “Trade Policy, Trade Costs, and Devel- oping Country Trade.” World Development 39, no. 12 (2011): 2069–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.013.

Ioannides, Isabelle. EU-UK Trade Flows: Continuities, Changes and Trends. EPRS Briefing PE 765.767. European Parliamentary Research Service, April 2025. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/docu- ment/EPRS_BRI(2025)765767.

World Economic Outlook: Global Economy in Flux. IMF Report. October 2025. https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/weo/2025/october/eng- lish/text.pdf.

World Trade Organization. Trade Policy Review: Switzerland and Liechtenstein— Summary. WT/TPR/S/280. Geneva: World Trade Organization, April 23, 2013. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp525_e.htm.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-22

How to Cite

Ziv-Loewy, S. (2026). A Guide to Orbiting Europe: An Analysis of Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade Between the Single Market and Non-EEA European States. Hemispheres, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.62327/pt4v9r8nqz